Fitness trackers · Ranked #10 of 14 · Best for subscription-free ring tracking

Ultrahuman Ring Air

80
Well liked
Average of 9 professional reviews
6 of 9 recommend it · broad agreement
Where the 9 reviews landedRange 70–90
Score printed by the outlet Estimated from the verdict

Exact average 79.8 · 6 printed, 3 estimated · printed scores only: 79

Ultrahuman Ring AirImage: Ultrahuman

9 professional reviewers tested the Ultrahuman Ring Air, and 6 recommend it. Most praised: health tracking. Most common complaint: battery life.

Reviewed by Trusted Reviews, Run to the Finish, AppleInsider and 6 more

The catch: Battery lasts only 4 to 6 days and exercise isn't detected automatically.

Check price at Amazon

We earn a commission if you buy through these links. It never changes a score.

What 9 critics said

Highest score first · all converted to 0–100
  1. 90
    Trusted ReviewsHands-on review · 2023

    A treat for anyone who dislikes wrist wearables: light, accurate, subscription-free tracking, with downsides of no auto exercise detection, slow charging and a fixed fit.

    Read Trusted Reviews review
  2. 85
    Run to the FinishHands-on review · 2025

    Brilliant tech that offers deep sleep, recovery and women's health insights for data fans, but costly and not worthwhile if you are already overwhelmed by data.

    Read Run to the Finish review
  3. 80
    AppleInsiderHands-on review · 2025

    Comfortable and unobtrusive ring with detailed, well-explained sleep and fitness data and no required subscription, though pricey and with battery longevity concerns.

    Read AppleInsider review
  4. 80
    Tech AdvisorHands-on review · 2024

    A strong smart ring close to the Oura in software and hardware, with solid sleep tracking and no subscription, though battery falls short of claims and workout tracking is weak.

    Read Tech Advisor review
  5. 70
    PCMagHands-on review · 2025

    Offers detailed sleep and stress tracking and a great free app without subscription, but slow syncing, inconsistent heart rate and pushy notifications keep it behind the Oura.

    Read PCMag review
  6. 70
    Android CentralHands-on review · 2024

    A very comfortable ring that tracks sleep and heart health consistently with good battery, but the app is confusing, notifications nag and fitness tracking is imperfect.

    Read Android Central review
  7. 83est.
    Trail & KaleNo printed score · Hands-on review

    Comfortable, discreet and subscription-free with good sleep and recovery insights, but weak at workout tracking and redundant if you already own a good running watch.

    Read Trail & Kale review
  8. 83est.
    WareableNo printed score · Hands-on review · 2023

    An excellent sleep tracker with thoughtful prompts that is well recommended if you can tolerate its chunky black look, though workout tracking is poor.

    Read Wareable review
  9. 77est.
    NBC SelectNo printed score · Hands-on review

    A light, comfortable ring with actionable suggestions and no subscription, but slow charging, modest battery and a jargon-heavy cluttered app make it best for tinkerers.

    Read NBC Select review

"Est." means the outlet printed no score, so we estimated one from its verdict and checked our estimates against ratings outlets print. How we check estimates

What critics praise most

Health tracking6 of 9

What critics dislike most

Battery life4 of 9
Software3 of 9
Price3 of 9

Other fitness trackers critics rate highly

Common questions

Is the Ultrahuman Ring Air worth it?

Critics are divided: 6 of 9 recommend it. Battery lasts only 4 to 6 days and exercise isn't detected automatically.

Do critics agree about the Ultrahuman Ring Air?

Broad agreement: scores range from 70 (PCMag) to 90 (Trusted Reviews), a spread of 20 points across 9 reviews. Most reviewers land fairly close together.

What do critics dislike about the Ultrahuman Ring Air?

Battery life (4 of 9 reviews), Software (3 of 9 reviews), Price (3 of 9 reviews).

What is the best alternative to the Ultrahuman Ring Air?

The Huawei Watch Fit 5 Pro (critic score 91), top pick, narrowly.